Power & performance

Borla vs MRT vs MagnaFlow Exhaust for Ford Maverick EcoBoost

· 2 min read

Ford Maverick EcoBoost with three stainless cat-back exhaust layouts compared beneath the rear bumper

FIT THE DRIVETRAIN AND PACKAGE FIRST; CHOOSE SOUND SECOND

High confidence · Last verified 27 Oct 2026

Borla, MRT and MagnaFlow all sell Maverick EcoBoost exhaust solutions, but the correct part depends on model year, FWD/AWD, Tremor/Lobo package, emissions equipment and exit layout. Borla publishes separate FWD, AWD and Tremor/Lobo applications; use the same part-number discipline for MRT and MagnaFlow. Listen for cruising drone as carefully as cold-start volume.

A cat-back changes sound far more predictably than power. Treat performance claims conservatively unless the maker publishes controlled testing for the exact application.

BrandBuying strengthMain check
BorlaExplicit FWD/AWD/Tremor-Lobo part splitCorrect part and GPF exclusion
MRTMultiple sound/exit approaches depending on current catalogExact drivetrain and tip location
MagnaFlowEstablished stainless cat-back lineupCurrent application and sound level

Borla's instructions assign 140937-series systems to FWD, 140938-series to AWD and 140948-series to Tremor. Its current catalog also groups Lobo with the specialized 140948 application and notes GPF exclusions.

Compatibility snapshot

CheckRequirement
VehicleYear, 2.0L engine and drivetrain listed
PackageTremor/Lobo/standard application explicit
EmissionsGPF and local emissions rules checked
ExitTip clears bumper, hitch and accessories
MaterialFull tubing/muffler material understood
UseCold start and highway drone acceptable

Bottom line

Choose the exact application first, then the sound profile. A quieter system that fits the drivetrain and does not drone is a better daily-driver purchase than the loudest catalog clip.

For intake-side choices, compare S&B vs K&N vs aFe cold-air intakes for the Maverick EcoBoost.


Sources & notes